MLJET
- Harris
-
Topic Author
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 1135
- Thanks: 60
MLJET
12 years 3 weeks ago - 12 years 3 weeks ago
For me the best 2 year old debut win this season. Marshall spoke very highly of him in the post race interview. Jayyed who he beat by a length only got beaten 2.5l by Afrikaburn on July day.
Owned and ridden by the Wylie Hall combination of Michael Leaf and MJ Byleveld he takes on a decent field but I think he will be up to the task on Saturday.
Owned and ridden by the Wylie Hall combination of Michael Leaf and MJ Byleveld he takes on a decent field but I think he will be up to the task on Saturday.
Last edit: 12 years 3 weeks ago by Harris.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Deeno
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 8174
- Thanks: 483
Re: MLJET
12 years 3 weeks agoHarris wrote: For me the best 2 year old debut win this season. Marshall spoke very highly of him in the post race interview. Jaycee who he beat by a length only got beaten 2.5l by Afrikaburn on July day.
Owned and ridden by the Wylie Hall combination of Michael Leaf and MJ Byleveld he takes on a decent field but I think he will be up to the task on Saturday.
ML for Michael Leaf... as suppose
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bob Brogan
-
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 83897
- Thanks: 6770
- Bob Brogan
-
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 83897
- Thanks: 6770
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- bigh
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: MLJET
12 years 3 weeks agoBob Brogan wrote: Looks a proper race horse,first time i had seen it..
What abt Light the Lights in same race...........won very impressively last time out
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PeeKay
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 7885
- Thanks: 223
Re: MLJET
12 years 3 weeks ago
Guys, this horse is tops.......take it from me......he will win tomorrow.
and yes......the ML does stand for the owner's initials
and yes......the ML does stand for the owner's initials
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Craig Pienaar
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 10502
- Thanks: 3329
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rolands song
-
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 1658
- Thanks: 149
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- shrek
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: MLJET
12 years 3 weeks ago
I was also very impressed with Mljet's debut. Looked lost until turning into the straight and then just turned it on against some useful horses. Same course and will know what it is about. Expect Mljet's to come home lonely.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- bayern
-
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 12254
- Thanks: 2796
Re: MLJET
12 years 3 weeks ago
Whilst the thread is about MLJet's winning chances based on who he beat and what the runner up subsequently achieved. A few things to bear in mind. Whilst MLJet debuted and won against winners, he was in receipt of 3.0kgs. MLJet was ultra impressive, and the runner up, Jayyed, didn't disgrace himself in a feature on July Day when running 5th, 2.55 lengths behind Afrikaburn. If we use and accept the collateral form argument for MLJet, then let's keep like for like when making a case for Light Up The Lights.
Two runs back, LUTL ran second to Forries Wlatz, 1.50 lengths behind, carrying level weights. On the very same day, in the LHB tool, LUTL would have run less than 0.20 lengths behind Serissa at level weights. Serissa came out and finished ahead of Futura in the Cup Trial two runs later. We all know why Forries Waltz did not compete in the race won by Afrikaburn on July Day. In it's next race, LUTL literally romped in. The runner up, Mootahadee, franked the form by winning next time out.
If we go on collateral form, then you'd have to agree LUTL's is better.
Quite frankly, 14/10 about MLJet is too short in my view, when you have a competitor in the same race trading at 9/2 with the better collateral form. I'll side with LUTL, should be a good race in prospect.
Two runs back, LUTL ran second to Forries Wlatz, 1.50 lengths behind, carrying level weights. On the very same day, in the LHB tool, LUTL would have run less than 0.20 lengths behind Serissa at level weights. Serissa came out and finished ahead of Futura in the Cup Trial two runs later. We all know why Forries Waltz did not compete in the race won by Afrikaburn on July Day. In it's next race, LUTL literally romped in. The runner up, Mootahadee, franked the form by winning next time out.
If we go on collateral form, then you'd have to agree LUTL's is better.
Quite frankly, 14/10 about MLJet is too short in my view, when you have a competitor in the same race trading at 9/2 with the better collateral form. I'll side with LUTL, should be a good race in prospect.
Guessing has never been widely acclaimed as a good gambling strategy.
The following user(s) said Thank You: mr hawaii
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- colors
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Re: MLJET
12 years 3 weeks agobayern wrote: Whilst the thread is about MLJet's winning chances based on who he beat and what the runner up subsequently achieved. A few things to bear in mind. Whilst MLJet debuted and won against winners, he was in receipt of 3.0kgs. MLJet was ultra impressive, and the runner up, Jayyed, didn't disgrace himself in a feature on July Day when running 5th, 2.55 lengths behind Afrikaburn. If we use and accept the collateral form argument for MLJet, then let's keep like for like when making a case for Light Up The Lights.
Two runs back, LUTL ran second to Forries Wlatz, 1.50 lengths behind, carrying level weights. On the very same day, in the LHB tool, LUTL would have run less than 0.20 lengths behind Serissa at level weights. Serissa came out and finished ahead of Futura in the Cup Trial two runs later. We all know why Forries Waltz did not compete in the race won by Afrikaburn on July Day. In it's next race, LUTL literally romped in. The runner up, Mootahadee, franked the form by winning next time out.
If we go on collateral form, then you'd have to agree LUTL's is better.
Quite frankly, 14/10 about MLJet is too short in my view, when you have a competitor in the same race trading at 9/2 with the better collateral form. I'll side with LUTL, should be a good race in prospect.
have a look at some links provided on the Clairwood thread
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Neptune
-
- New Member
-
- Thanks: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.142 seconds

